31
AI Content / Re: Marcus AI Art
« Last post by marcus on October 27, 2026, 07:01:55 pm »Gemini is what I almost always use too. It can be very smutty, you just have to work with it.I've gradually been learning to finesse the guardrails with techniques like using innocuous terminology (for instance, I've found that it will more readily generate pics that show ladies' underwear if they're referred to as bikini tops and bottoms rather than bras and panties even though the visual output is practically identical). It tends not to pick up on obvious implications, and usually lets me get away with letting me specify a pose where a woman has her thumbs hooked into the sides of her
Quote
Saying something pretty dirty, and then walking it back, often has the AI just ignore the walk-back.
Occasionally, I've been able to get Gemini to do something it balked at earlier by changing something unrelated to the triggering material. Conversely, I've found that it I've managed to push the boundaries it will balk because I changed something unrelated to the triggering material that I'd gotten away with earlier in the prompt-tweaking process.
Quote
My theory is that AI is trained on pretty smutty, sexualized sources, with guard-rails added later. So if you can give it a bit of space to 'express itself' (I know how AI works, just I can't find a better phrase without talking technically) without using certain words or aspects of an image, it mirrors the things it was trained on.
Possibly, though the training might also help it recognize material that it's not supposed to allow you to generate.
Quote
It probably helps that my prompts are stupidly long, with lots of detail - I think a lot of its resources are being devoted to a particular piece of clothing or hairstyle, and that makes the smut slip through.
I tend to do the same, sometimes bundling a batch of prompt additions and refinements into one fresh extended starting prompt if I get bogged down (repeated "I won't generate that you pervert" error messages, repeated AI hallucinations that don't go away even when the program is specifically told what to correct, etc).
Quote
Oh, and I don't use the word 'smut' because I'm censoring myself. It's just that my images are pretty 'smutty' rather than massively explicit, as are yours.
True. The pulp cover parodies in particular call for a certain level of spiciness while remaining within the boundaries that publishers in the actual classic pulp era could get away with.

Recent Posts




